Skip to main content

SaaS & Managed

AutoKYC vs Alloy: Unified orchestration with managed case execution

Compare AutoKYC’s multi-provider orchestration and managed KYB/KYC services with Alloy’s decisioning platform, including a roadmap for migration.

Competitor Alloy Identity decisioning platform for KYC, KYB, and transaction monitoring orchestration.
Visit website

Focus: Unified decisioning and orchestration

Headquarters: New York, United States

Why teams migrate

Alloy streamlines decisioning but leaves operations to your team. AutoKYC extends orchestration with consent-aware SDKs, dual AML networks, and optional managed analysts who execute policies day-to-day.

TL;DR comparison

Operational coverage

AutoKYC
Delivers platform orchestration plus managed analysts with voting, QA, and regulator-ready documentation.
Alloy
Focuses on decisioning; customers run analysts, QA, and regulator communications separately.

Rules lifecycle

AutoKYC
Policy versioning with impact simulations, scheduled releases, and access controls.
Alloy
Powerful rule builder but change governance lives outside the platform.

Provider resilience

AutoKYC
Monitors provider latency, queues traffic automatically, and fails over using quorum-based voting.
Alloy
Routing logic is configurable but mitigation playbooks and staffing are customer managed.

Managed services

AutoKYC
Hybrid option embeds AutoKYC analysts who own SLAs, QA, and regulatory responses.
Alloy
Relies on the customer’s internal operations or third parties.

Capability matrix

Evaluate how AutoKYC combines SaaS orchestration and managed operations against Alloy.

Detailed feature comparison between AutoKYC and Alloy
CapabilityAutoKYC SaaS PlatformAutoKYC Managed ServicesAlloy
Multi-product coverageKYC, KYB, sanctions, ODD/EDD, casework, and audit logs in one console.Managed teams execute onboarding, refreshes, and escalations with SLA guarantees.Decisioning across data sources; casework and audit tooling require separate systems.
Rules & experiment safeguardsSandboxed rule testing, approval workflows, and rollback safety nets.Compliance leads co-own release calendars with AutoKYC programme managers.Rules can be deployed quickly; change control is customer governed.
SDKs and embedsConsent-aware web and mobile SDKs with built-in accessibility, localisation, and analytics gating.Experience strategists tune conversion and script outreach for drop-offs.Requires customers to design and host their own onboarding front ends.
Audit and regulator evidenceImmutable logs, tamper-evident exports, data residency controls, and retention schedules.Analysts annotate cases, compile regulator-ready reports, and own remediation trackers.Event logs available; regulator packs assembled outside the platform.
Provider health monitoringReal-time latency, error, and hit-rate dashboards plus automated rerouting.Ops desk coordinates provider incidents and communicates with regulators.Reporting available but mitigation remains on customer analysts.

Detailed analysis

Understand where AutoKYC’s dual proposition supports regulated onboarding programmes end-to-end.

Alloy delivers strong orchestration for risk decisions, but day-to-day operations, staffing, and audit-ready reporting are still owned by your teams. AutoKYC combines orchestration with managed analysts, immutable audit trails, and data residency controls so regulated organisations can standardise onboarding without shrinking oversight. With dual AML providers, KYB graphing, and privacy-first SDKs, AutoKYC covers the entire lifecycle from onboarding to regulator conversations.

Migration playbook: Alloy to AutoKYC

Migration emphasises low-risk parallel runs, dual provider testing, and operational rehearsals so regulated teams can switch decisioning and casework to AutoKYC without interrupting revenue.

  1. 1 Baseline Alloy performance

    Export Alloy metrics (latency, hit rates, false positives) to define acceptance criteria for AutoKYC.

    Owner
    Risk & Analytics
    Timeframe
    1 week
    Deliverable
    Baseline performance dossier
  2. 2 Configure AutoKYC orchestration

    Wire data providers, configure rules, and align voting logic with policy owners.

    Owner
    Engineering & Compliance
    Timeframe
    3 weeks
    Deliverable
    Signed-off ruleset with automated tests
  3. 3 Parallel-run cohorts

    Run 20–30% of traffic through AutoKYC, compare outputs, and remediate variances with joint analyst reviews.

    Owner
    Programme Lead
    Timeframe
    3 weeks
    Deliverable
    Parity report and cutover checklist
  4. 4 Hybrid operations ramp

    If using managed services, transition cases in tiers, set QA cadences, and align escalation SLAs.

    Owner
    AutoKYC Operations
    Timeframe
    2 weeks
    Deliverable
    Operational readiness runbook

Best fit for AutoKYC

  • Banks and fintechs that want managed analysts accountable for SLAs.
  • Teams consolidating onboarding, AML, and ODD/EDD into one platform.
  • Compliance leaders that need rigorous audit and change governance.

FAQs on migrating from Alloy

Practical clarifications for compliance, engineering, and operations teams orchestrating the switch.

Can AutoKYC orchestrate the same data partners we run through Alloy?

Yes. AutoKYC connects to the same data sources plus multi-provider AML and KYB registries, giving you weighted results, health monitoring, and managed analyst oversight in one system.

How does AutoKYC support policy testing before deployment?

Rules are version-controlled with draft environments, traffic sampling, and rollback windows. Impact analysis shows how decisions shift before you ship.

Is there managed analyst coverage for high-risk reviews?

AutoKYC managed services provide tiered analysts, QA scoring, and escalation voting. You can keep work in-house or run hybrid programmes with shared queues.

Migrate with us

Bring SaaS orchestration and managed analysts into a single programme. We will migrate evidence, policies, and audit trails without downtime.

Book migration workshop Review pricing